Disappointment with Trump carries grave danger for Israel
Judge Sidelines Pete Hegseth Policy Requiring Press Escorts In Visits To Pentagon
Falncia moral eurocntrica e o medo do Sul Global.
- bsoplvr
Amrica Latina: ofensiva imperialista, crisis de hegemona y retorno de la lucha de clases
Por Milton DLen en .
Falncia moral eurocntrica e o medo do Sul Global
Cada vez mais, a periferia do mundo deixa de ser apenas uma categoria geogrfica. Ampliao dos Brics simboliza esse deslocamento. A resistncia ao Ocidente necessria, mas insuficiente: requer outra gramtica do mundo que questione a prpria ideia de centroCritics Condemn Trumps Reaction to Supreme Court Birthright Citizenship Ruling
Original title: Trump skewered for 'un-American' response to Supreme Court ruling: 'He should resign'
IA: It's clickbait
Users: It's clickbait
View full AI summary
...
I Love Donald TrumpCritics Condemn Trumps Reaction to Supreme Court Birthright Citizenship Ruling
Original title: Trump skewered for 'un-American' response to Supreme Court ruling: 'He should resign'
IA: It's clickbait
Users: It's clickbait
View full AI summary
...
U.S. Supreme Court: No More Transwomen in Womens School Sports
Em discurso, Lula d recado a Trump, defende soberania da Amrica Latina e incentiva acordo com a China
Kai Trump & Mom Vanessa Trump Share Best Time Together in Rare Photos
Trumps and Commerce Secretarys Sons Set to Profit From Tungsten Mining Deal
Partage, veille et lecture : Le drapeau arc-en-ciel plus fort que Trump - Le dessous des images - ARTE - YouTube Retir sur ordre de l'administration Trump, le drapeau arc-en-ciel a de nouveau t hiss le 12 fvrier 2026 Manhattan, berceau historique du mouvement. Un...John Roberts Believes In The Unitary Executive, Except For When It Might Crash His Investment Portfolio
Inaceptables insinuaciones del PP
El Supremo rechaza el intento de Trump de acabar con el derecho a la ciudadana por nacimiento en Estados Unidos
Supreme Court Rejects Birthright Citizenship Order, Splits on Transgender Athletes and Campaign Cash
The Supreme Court birthright ruling struck down Trump's executive order, even as the justices sided with states on transgender athletes and campaign finance limits.What to know about the US supreme court ruling on birthright citizenship
Trump Spotted With Aide Natalie Harp At His Virginia Golf Club
WHAT HAPPENS IF NATALIE FORGETS TO WIND HIM UP
PT acionar Justia contra Flvio Bolsonaro e PL por articulao com governo dos EUA
The Guardian view on Colombias election: Trumpism has gone transnational Editorial
Conflict over and sees government defending from attacks by criminals, gang members, and thugs (the )
Yearning to Breathe Free
The poem on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor is a sonnet titled written by American poet Emma Lazarus in 1883. Its famous lines, Give me your tired, your poor, / Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free transformed the statue from a monument of generic liberty into a worldwide symbol of immigration, refuge, and hope.
Lady Liberty was the first thing millions of immigrants saw as they arrived in the New World. Her name, the poem declares, is Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand Glows world-wide welcome.
Not anymore. Unless you can trace your lineage to the indigenous people of North America, and only of the current population of the United States can do so, your ancestors came from someplace else. As you contemplate the 250th anniversary of the birth of our nation, you might consider that without the welcoming arms of the United States, your personal history would be quite different.
Although the United States is a nation of immigrants, there has which . French and Irish immigrants were targeted in the 1790s. In 1798, President John Adams signed the Alien and Sedition Acts. This extended the naturalization residency requirement from 5 to 14 years and allowed the government to deport dangerous open-door arrivals.
Catholics in the 1840s. Protestant Americans feared that an influx of Catholics would be loyal to the Pope rather than the U.S. government. The late 19th Century brought racial exclusion with the target being Chinese and other Asian laborers. the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. It was the first major federal law to ban immigration based explicitly on race and nationality. The 20th Century brought a quota system, starting with the .
Modern opposition to immigration in the United States differs from historical eras by focusing heavily on border security, legal status, and federal enforcement rather than explicit racial exclusion. Under the administration of Donald Trump, the federal government has pushed measures like the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and the Laken Riley Act, which expand mandatory detentions, mandate higher federal funding for border walls, and limit federal benefits for even lawfully present immigrants. At this time immigration to the United States has basically stopped. With the exception of a special exception for white South Africans who claim they are being persecuted in their home country.
We as a people are deeply split on this issue. Data from shows that about 52% of Americans believe current administration tactics go too far on deportations, highlighting a steep partisan gap. According to polling compiled by , while a majority of Republicans strongly back federal agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), most Democrats and independents hold unfavorable views of hardline enforcement. Conversely, a vast cross-partisan majority of voters (around 72%, according to the ) favor a compromise solution pairing strict border security with a path to earned legal status for those already in the country.
Congresss ongoing inability to pass a comprehensive, long-term immigration reform bill has left Americas immigration system broken, forcing a reliance on executive orders and courtroom battles instead of permanent laws. For decades, the standard playbook of a grand compromise pairing enhanced border enforcement with a pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants has repeatedly under intense partisan polarization.
Because Congress cannot pass permanent laws, immigration policy changes drastically with every presidential administration. Borders are managed and humanitarian protections are granted or revoked entirely by executive actions, which are immediately challenged in court.
Last week the Supreme Court issued two monumental 6-3 rulings that significantly expanded the federal governments power to enforce hardline border restrictions and strip protections from long-term residents. Both decisions split strictly along the Courts conservative-liberal divide. They represent major legal victories for the Trump administrations America First anti-immigration agenda.
Both majority opinions were written by Justice Samuel Alito. In , dealing with Temporary Protected Status, the majority emphasized that federal courts are legally prohibited from reviewing the Department of Homeland Securitys policy decisions on TPS, rejecting arguments that the terminations were racially motivated.
There is no judicial review of any determination of the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the designation, or termination or extension of a designation, of a foreign state under this subsection This text is clear, and its plain meaning is very broad.
, Alito, Majority Opinion
The liberal justices argued that the Court bypassed critical constitutional tests regarding equal protection and executive bias. In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor called out the administrations past derogatory statements about the affected nations.
The referencesof filth, disease, and primitivenessare shot through with racial stereotypes and tropes The statements fairly shout, in their racial undertones and overtones alike, that race entered into the Presidents resolve to remove Haitians from this country.
, Sotomayor, dissenting
In , dealing with asylum eligibility, the conservative majority focused strictly on the literal geography of the border line under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
An alien standing in Mexico does not arrive in the United States by attempting, and failing, to set foot in this country. An alien arrives in the United States only when he crosses the border.
, Alito, Majority Opinion
Dissenting again, Justice Sotomayor (joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson), found the liberal minority arguing that the ruling functionally dismantles humanitarian protocols established by Congress.
The majoritys decision blesses the Executive Branchs decision to slam the door shut on all who are fleeing persecution, despite the detailed inspection and asylum system that Congress enacted and commands.
, Sotomayor, dissenting
The initial effect of the first decision will be the immediate loss of TPS legal status for 350,000 people, mostly Haitian. That and valid work permits and puts them at immediate risk of arrest and removal. The effect of a second decision clears the Trump administration to continue its current policy of turning away asylum seekers who come the U.S. borders.
Trump advisor Stephen Miller, who has led the administrations anti-immigration policy, says the administration will move to remove the roughly 1.3 million TPS migrants, warning that if you no longer have status in this country, then youre supposed to be deported. Millers ancestors escaped Russian pogroms and the Holocaust. He also declared, Americas doors are closed fully to asylum seekers, asylum applications as fake. Trumps came from Germany and Scotland.
The welcome mat has been pulled up at the door of the once-shinning beacon of hope for the world.
Happy 250th.
####
We Keep That Promise Today: Supreme Courts Ruling on Birthright Citizenship
Trump says DCs East Potomac Golf Links renovation to begin Sept. 1
Consultora poltica refleja orientacin del gobierno: Sheinbaum
Afirma que cada administracin define con quin decide vincularse
Por Paola Ramrez Reportera
La presidente Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo afirm que la eventual contratacin de un consultor poltico internacional por parte de un gobierno estatal, como el de San Luis Potos, refleja la orientacin de esa administracin.
Durante su la titular del Ejecutivo seal que una consultora poltica transmite un mensaje sobre la visin de un gobierno y sobre con quin decide establecer vnculos, aunque aclar que este tipo de contratos no est prohibido por la ley.
En el caso de consultoras para asuntos polticos, pues es distinto, tampoco est prohibido, pero habla, cuando se llega a hacer una contratacin de este tipo, pues de cul es la visin del gobierno y con quin est haciendo estos contratos, expres.
La presidente sostuvo que las asesoras internacionales pueden justificarse cuando existe una necesidad tcnica especializada sin embargo, consider que las consultoras de carcter poltico reflejan la postura de quienes las contratan.
No es ilegal, pero dependiendo de quin es la asesora, pues muestra la orientacin de los gobiernos. En general, pues hay muchos mexicanos y mexicanas aqu que no necesitan, no necesitamos contratar a nadie de fuera, a menos que haya casos especiales donde hay una especialidad particular que no se encuentra en Mxico, agreg.
Contratacin de consultores estadounidenses
Las declaraciones surgieron tras la publicacin sobre la contratacin del consultor estadounidense Roger Stone y su socia Diana London por parte del gobierno de San Luis Potos, mediante contratos por 750 mil dlares.
De acuerdo con la informacin difundida, los convenios fueron firmados para prestar servicios de relaciones pblicas y asesora en la relacin con funcionarios de Estados Unidos en temas de comercio y desarrollo econmico.
Aunque no se les conoce experiencia previa en asuntos relacionados con Mxico, ambos consultores tendran como funcin asesorar e incluso representar al gobierno potosino ante autoridades estadounidenses.
No obstante, el gobierno estatal dej abierta la posibilidad de modificar el alcance de los servicios contratados.
Stone recibi un indulto de Trump
Roger Stone, de 73 aos, ha sido identificado en los ltimos meses como intermediario en gestiones para obtener indultos presidenciales y reducciones de penas en Estados Unidos.
En 2020 fue indultado por el entonces presidente Donald Trump, luego de ser condenado por su participacin en la investigacin sobre la presunta injerencia rusa en la eleccin presidencial de 2016.
Posteriormente intervino en favor del expresidente hondureo Juan Orlando Hernndez, condenado por narcotrfico en 2024, quien tambin recibi un indulto de Trump.
La contratacin ocurre despus de que The New York Times public que autoridades estadounidenses investigan presuntos vnculos de polticos mexicanos, incluidos mandatarios, con organizaciones del narcotrfico.
Gobierno federal slo contrata asesoras tcnicas
La presidente explic que el gobierno federal nicamente recurre a consultores extranjeros cuando se requiere una especialidad tcnica que no existe en el pas.
Como ejemplo mencion que, tras el accidente registrado en el Tren Interocenico, se contrat a una empresa alemana para elaborar un dictamen especializado.
computadoras, personas trabajandoCuando se hace la revisin del Interocenico despus del accidente, contratamos a una empresa alemana porque no hay una empresa con la misma especialidad en Mxico que pueda analizar o que pueda recomendar mejoras en el Tren Interocenico, puntualiz. sn
Conctate con ! Suscrbete a nuestro canal dey activa las notificaciones, o bien, sguenos en las redes sociales: , e .
Tambin, te invitamos a que te sumes a nuestro canal de informacin en tiempo real a travs de .
El Supremo de EE.UU. da otro revs a Trump: tumba su intento de acabar con el derecho a la ciudadana por nacimiento En cambio, s respalda las leyes que prohben a atletas trans competir en equipos femeninos.
Suprema Corte dos EUA mantm cidadania por nascimento e impe derrota poltica migratria de Trump
Por qu el Supremo de EEUU tumba el plan de Trump contra el ius soli
SWAMP THING, TRUMP...
DRAINING THE SWAMP AFTER THE LATEST SUPREME COURT RULING ON MONEY IN POLITICS:
The PM's pragmatic foreign policy restores Canadian pride, but domestic economic challenges loom.
Trump's push to end birthright citizenship hits a legal wall in US
NPR Retracts Report That Justice Samuel Alito Is Retiring
Estados Unidos mantiene ciudadana por nacimiento: Suprema Corte
El Supremo de EEUU considera ilegal la orden de Trump que limita la ciudadana por nacimiento
SN Redaccin EFE
Washington.-
El Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos consider este martes ilegal la orden ejecutiva del presidente, Donald Trump, para limitar la ciudadana de personas nacidas en territorio estadounidense como hijos de padres indocumentados o con visados temporales, un derecho que la corte considera consagrado en la Carta Magna.
El dictamen reconoce que los nios nacidos en los Estados Unidos de padres presentes de manera ilegal o temporal estn sujetos a la jurisdiccin por lo que son ciudadanos desde el nacimiento en virtud de la clusula de ciudadana de la Decimocuarta Enmienda.
La decisin fue adoptada por cincos votos a favor y cuatro en contra de los magistrados que componen la corte y mantiene una interpretacin de la Constitucin que durante ms de 150 aos considera estadounidense a casi cualquier persona -existen excepciones como los hijos de funcionarios diplomticos- que nazca dentro de la nacin.
El juez Brett Kavanaugh disinti en parte al no compartir la concepcin maximalista de la clusula de ciudadana al tiempo que no respalda el decreto de Trump que eliminara de facto la ciudadana por nacimiento.
Otros tres jueces considerados conservadores disintieron del voto de la mayora al no reconocer la ciudadana por nacimiento totalmente automtica.
Trump prometi limitar la ciudadana para hijos de migrantes irregulares
Trump haba prometido en campaa limitar la ciudadana automtica para hijos de migrantes irregulares, una medida que firm el mismo da en que asumi su segundo mandato el 20 de enero de 2025 y que inaugur un periodo de restrictivas polticas antimigratorias.
La orden, que afectara a unos 255.000 nios al ao, queda anulada con la decisin de hoy del Supremo, que analiza en el fallo qu significa ser ciudadano estadounidense y concluye que alguien nacido en Estados Unidos y sometido a sus leyes entra en el mbito de la ciudadana por nacimiento.
El inquilino de la Casa Blanca acudi el pasado mes de abril a la sesin pblica de la Corte Suprema en la que se debati la legalidad de la orden, la primera vez que un mandatario estadounidense en ejercicio presencia argumentos orales ante el alto tribunal. sn
Fotografa de archivo de un grupo de personas estudiando para realizar el examen de ciudadana de EE.UU. EFE/ Felipe ChacnConctate con ! Suscrbete a nuestro canal dey activa las notificaciones, o bien, sguenos en las redes sociales: , e .
Tambin, te invitamos a que te sumes a nuestro canal de informacin en tiempo real a travs de .
US treasury secretary warns oil and gas companies to lower prices: were watching
Wayne Rooneys Wild Story About Playing Golf With Donald Trump
Trump says DCs East Potomac Golf Links renovation to begin Sept. 1
The extra E is for Epstein: Social media roasts Trump team for typo in state fair billboard
Loser